The Bad:Tri… yeah..I'd go with the Beretta 92 as well. It just doesn't seem worth it. Get your answers by asking now. Anonymous. [ARCHIVED THREAD] - Beretta 92/M9 vs CZ-75. The CZ has the most going for it in the line of options and accessories. Guns are different but the same. Does anybody know if the CZ 75s have had any well documented problems? ARCHIVED; Posted: 2/28/2013 5:54:43 AM EST I'm assuming most of us prefer the Beretta, but why? Tough to beat a Beretta 92 as a suppressor host outside of pistols specifically designed around suppressor use. I have both. CZ is a good weapon, but … Source(s): https://shrinke.im/a70cM. M9a3 is also a tank, and a combat proven platform that’s had 30 years of end user gripes addressed in the latest iteration. You should pick the one that fits your hand the best. I figure that if I'm in that bad of a situation where I have 1 second to fire a bullet, I'm probably a goner anyways. I prefer the CZ 75 for ergonomics. And it was softer shooting. Ummm? I haven't had enough trigger time on the Beretta to comment on its accuracy or reliabilty, but in terms of ergonomics, I prefer the CZs. There's just something about the way the Beretta feels in the hand. The P-01 came in a steel version [99021 & 99041] that shoots even better, and if you absolutely don't care about the rail then the 75 compact [91190] is steel and is an excellent choice. The CZ fits my hands perfectly whereas the "Beretta" seems like a … It was a bit thick as a conceal carry, and years later I picked up the CZ 75 Compact. I am about to make a totally opinionated statement that is not based on any fact besides my personal observations. The Beretta 92 is not capable of the accuracy that the CZ is, not that you are buying this pistol for bullseye shooting, but hey. The Ugly:The pistol’s default grips are mediocre. This isnt a … Still have questions? Even with a manual safety on I don't want a bullet in the chamber ... Is there a universal agreement between all criminals out there that if you are a civilian out side of Harlem they would give you time to draw and rack the slide that I somehow missed? Beretta/Wilson Combat 92G Brigadier Tactical vs CZ Shadow 2. All information is provided "as is" with all faults without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. I want this for range, match and just regular shooting. Those are two somewhat similar and very nice guns. I don't carry any of them. It felt great in the hand. What gives? empty vs the Beretta's 36, it sounds like it could. 1) I disliked the fact that my model had no decocker. Striker fired guns I would place in a different category. CZ 75 and 92fs Inox. It's looking that way, but like I said a few posts back, I think that has a lot to do with grip size. I know the saying "if you haven't hit them in 15 shots, you won't hit them with one more" but I'd rather have that extra shot available if my life is riding on the outcome. Hi all! The CZ feels great, but for some reason, even as bulky as the 92 feels in the hand, it points for me like pointing my finger. Listed as the M9, it’s an extremely reliable Single Action/Double Action pistol with good magazine capacity and easy maintenance procedures. Has anyone else experienced this when handling and firing a Beretta 92 series? Does it feel too heavy? They may be comparable in durability, but that is not the only characteristic to consider when choosing a handgun. I like the Beretta better. I love them both equally. Cz 75 Vs Beretta 92. The answer of this question is very subjective. RE: cz 75b vs beretta 92fs? Some revisions were made over the years, of course, and there are now a number of variants to be had besides the base 92FS model. CZ-75 most accurate when use best loads, better at quick draw, fit my hand better. The cz seems long and hard to me in double action. In fact, when the CZ-75B first hit the US, Fobus sold their Beretta 92 holster as their CZ holster; they later relabeled it, but I couldn't see any real differences. Double/single action striker fired gun, with a 4.1" bbl and a 18 round mag....excellent da/sa trigger out of the box w/ de-cocker for about $375. The CZ 75’s slide rides inside the frame rails. They are among the most reliable and trouble-free handgun magazines I have ever used and hold up very well. As a unit armorer in the Army, and as a civilian, I have a lot of experience with the Beretta 92. Both pistols are reliable. Eventually, I'll get a Beretta. This Site Might Help You. Sig Legion vs Wilson Combat Beretta 92 VS CZ 75 Shadow 2 - posted in Gear: I really have a hankering for a new blaster. 0 0. The Good:Reliable. I owned a CZ-75B, and while it wasn't a bad gun, I have some reasons as to why I prefer the Beretta 92/M9 over the CZ series. Nearly every single pistol was capable of a group of less than 2 inches at 25 yards and less than 1 inch at 35 feet (11.7 yards). My CZ85's are noticeably more accurate than my Beretta 92's in single action shooting. Standard Beretta magazines hold 15 rounds, standard magazines for the CZ hold 16. It felt great in the hand. Having said that, I shot a Beretta 92 very recently and it was extremely easy connecting to targets. It’s very barebones all around – but sturdy. *I find the decocker/safety on the CZ less complicated and I don't think I've ever held a more comfortable hand gun. 0 0? Jump to Latest Follow ... Love both my Brig Tac and my CZ 75 Tactical Sport Orange (TSO). And it was softer shooting. I'm the "can't decide so get um all" kind of guy. My experience with either Beretta factory-branded magazines, or Mec-gar magazines for the 92FS have been excellent. Not so the CZ. how heavy does a bow have to have to pierce a human skull? Cant decide. CZ may be a bit less expensive depending upon the model you would decide upon. I've … I believe the fit, finish, and feel of the CZ 75 is of higher quality than the Beretta 92. I like the CZ75B over the "Beretta" because I have small hands. Sig, CZ,and Beretta are all high quality handguns so you have to decide which is the most chosen one. And the CZ is light, fast, and sits low in the hand. I like Sigs, but I just don't want to spend the money. So I've narrowed it down to a Beretta 92FS/M9 or CZ 75B. So I'm already a few steps ahead of most people without having it cocked and locked. Compare the dimensions and specs of Beretta 92FS and CZ 75 B I carry with safety on and nothing in the chamber, and rack the slide if I think I might be walking into a bad situation. Im looking to buy a 9mm and ive narrowed it down to either a Cz 75b or a Beretta 92fs which one is better and why? I own a CZ 75 SP-01, and I've shot both the CZ 75B and the Beretta M9 a couple of times. Both are great guns. However, more and more law enforcement agencies are ditching it in favor of striker-fire Glocks and Sig Sauers. Hunting: with the lead ban coming across Europe what will the 22 rimfire bullets be made from ? Having owned both I would recommend the Beretta. If I invent a fish magnet that brings all the fish direct into my net, will I be rich ? Any feedback on the above listed guns? It is also very comfortable to shoot. I mean really, how many civilians have actually had their lives saved by having a gun cocked a locked? They would have chosen the better one. But the CZ 75 (full size) shoots better. Both are very good guns. I own a Beretta 92 Compact and a CZ 75 Compact. At 46.5 oz. I have both: CZ 75 SP-01 and a Beretta 92 Brigadier. I think of the two, the Beretta had slightly less recoil. Hunting: is the 280 Ross safe to shoot as I heard that the bolt can shoot out into your face . If you were leaning toward a CZ to CCW, two of the strongest contenders are going to come down to the CZ 75 Compact vs PCR.CZ makes some of the best pistols to be had, though their product lineup is a bit heavier on the full-size guns than on concealed carry pistols. Most pistols have slides that fit over and ride outside of the frame’s rails. Neither The High Road nor any of its directors, members, managers, employees, agents, vendors, or suppliers will be liable for any direct, indirect, general, bodily injury, compensatory, special, punitive, consequential, or incidental damages including, without limitation, lost profits or revenues, costs of replacement goods, loss or damage to data arising out of the use or inability to use this forum or any services associated with this forum, or damages from the use of or reliance on the information present on this forum, even if you have been advised of the possibility of such damages. EDIT: Another thing to consider is the magazine capacity. The 92F is a pretty nice shooting, good qulaity and predictable 9mm. Having said that, I shot a Beretta 92 very recently and it was extremely easy connecting to targets. I am looking for a solid frame 9mm double stack DA/SA service pistol. If a 410 can also shoot 45's, can a 28 gauge shoot 50 caliber? Good magazine capacity. CZ 75 SP-01 vs. Beretta 92FS. CZ 75 Tactical Sport 9mm Pardini GT45-II 9mm Beretta 92 Combat 9mm Glock 17L 9mm (3rd gen) Results Based on the best group sizes, nearly all of the pistols performed well. I have two CZ 75 variants and … Between the full size Beretta 92 and CZ-75, I prefer the Beretta. When I first got the Beretta, I really enjoyed it, but realized that I wasn't super impressed with it. I see what you mean, but I just don't feel comfortable potentially betting my life that the hammer isn't going to drop with a live round in the chamber. Plus, CZs are very popular among both precision and IPSC shooters here in Germany, whereas I don't know anyone who has a Beretta. Both fine weapons that I would not feel undergunned with. I won't be carrying it, but carrying my G19. Really you should go fondle both and see which gun feels better to you. CZ-75 vs Beretta 92? And of the two, I connected to targets better with my full sized CZ 75 but that probably had to do with the fact that it was my gun that I have experience with. The Beretta 92 is the standard sidearm for most conventional U.S. military forces. Clash Of The Compact CZs: CZ 75D PCR vs CZ 75 Compact. Decent factory sights. Try them both and go with the one YOU like better. As much as I love Glocks, I would NEVER carry one with a bullet in the chamber. The 92 used to have problems with the locking block cracking but that issue was resolved years ago. In terms of durability, I suspect that the CZs' steel frame is superior to the Beretta's aluminum frame. I have some experience with the Beretta M9 from shooting it in the military. I might take the Beretta, only because I have to qualify with one and teach others to qualify with one, but for use, I'd prefer the CZ. I have two CZ 75 variants and I can say that about both of them as well. You can sign in to vote the answer. How do you think about the answers? Beretta is much more accurate at DA, then SA, transition double taps because the sear break is at the identical point in trigger travel. With regards to the CZ 75 I really can't comment too intelligently since I have never owned one. I have owned and shot both (well, the 92 style was actually a Taurus 99 but I have also shot a real Beretta and it was no different). Join Yahoo Answers and get 100 points today. Although The High Road has attempted to provide accurate information on the forum, The High Road assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the information. It's a GREAT handgun, but it isn't quite the handgun that the CZ 75 is. You're talking like 3 1/2 lbs. I did not grow up on the Beretta; served 1971-1977 as an MP and carried the 1911A1 later, for awhile, as a cop. Beretta slide is easier to grasp and control with wet, slimey, or cold hands. Every one I have shot has a cruddy trigger out of the box. I shoot the CZ more, but I love both of them. ... ive shot both in idpa competitions and id personally take the CZ any day over the 92. might be my military background but i hate the 92. Just holding one and looking at it, the Beretta seems a LOT larger than the CZ-75. Like I said, if my life depended on a quick draw, then I'm probably a goner anyways. Yeah, I'm a civilian, and personally I would never carry a gun cocked and locked unless I'm walking around Harlem with a pound of gold on. I figure that most people don't even have a gun, let alone carry one every day. While I personally prefer the CZ-75 over the Beretta 92 (I have both), there are many folks who would champion the Beretta for many of the same reasons. I have both. The sp01s come with a rail but the cz 75 can be had without. The CZ is the winner all way around. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register. Tactical models, compact versions for … I say CZ-75. It's by far my favorite pistol, paired with a Kadet kit I bought as well. And speaking of striker fired guns.... since you are looking at a full size duty gun- (and both DA/SA) let me recommend the Turkish made Canik TP9 DA. http://www.ignatius-piazza-front-si...ights-monday-blog-why-you-carry-a-loaded-gun/. CZ 75 - steel frame, frame mounted safety and the ability to carry cocked and locked, and a less bulky grip. Discussion in 'Handguns: Autoloaders' started by Satasaurus, Mar 31, 2013. And IIRC MecGar makes 17 round flush fit mags for the Beretta as well as +2 extensions. Source(s): cz 75b beretta 92fs: https://tr.im/8eEMA. The same is true of the CZ 75, of course, but you can get a Beretta 92 to fit multiple tastes. Why it might be a 'mistake' to file your 2020 taxes now, Emotional moment during Trump impeachment speech, NFL player helps raise $350K for girl injured in Reid crash, Geraldo Rivera insists Trump is 'guilty as charged', Claudia Conway set to appear on 'American Idol', CDC pleads with Americans to 'avoid travel', Grandfather sentenced in child's cruise ship death, Eli Lilly chief quits due to 'inappropriate' relationship, Mahomes will have surgery for turf toe injury, A few vaccine recipients get rare blood disorder, 'QAnon Shaman': I'm 'deeply disappointed' in Trump. *Also the decocker on the CZ is much quieter than the Beretta. The CZ's ergonomics are better, IMO and the CZ is also a bit more accurate as well. But as mentioned, Matthew or Angus can make it sweet. I'd say it's easy to see the preferred one is the CZ. Similar to the Beretta 92, the CZ 75 (and thus, the Shadow 2) has its own proprietary slide design. 5 years ago. Each have advantages, Beretta ultra-reliable, never jams if use all loads, much easier disassembly when clean it, fires wider variety of ammo. Probably more personal choice, I would go with the Beretta, just my choice. Personally i like the trigger (with a 92g spring) better on the 92. 01-25-2017, 09:31 PM #12. The military pistol. Nor did it seem to balance as well for me. But it really is just a personal choice thing. I believe the fit, finish, and feel of the CZ 75 is of higher quality than the Beretta 92. But I picked up a Beretta, and it was easy as point and shoot. I do like the gun but my experiences have been qualifying with it a few times and that's about it. Both are excellent guns. Maybe that fat grip distributes the recoil well, although the CZ is no slouch in that department, either. Also, a very comfortable gun in 9mm. My CZ was accurate and reliable but was not of the same build quality as the 92 series Beretta. This achieves a better frame-to-slide fit, which improves accuracy. loaded. I would place the Sig, CZ, Beretta, on top of all other handguns......BUT....IMO the 92 is still above all other handguns in that size/class. I own several of each. The 92a1 and m9a1 also incorporate a rail so if you are wanting to mount accessories it might be worth it to look into those model over the standard 92fs. I've come to the conclusion that the choice between these two in particular is purely personal opinion. I picked them both because I collect, but I prefer the grip of the CZ. The Beretta 92, CZ 75 and Browning HP all have their shortcomings, but they certainly belong on my “best of” list, again for advancing the breed, but if you want to go historical, you might even have to include the “Red 9” Broomhandles along with the Luger and P-38 for bringing the 9 mm to the world’s attention. I have a question for you all. Debating between a Beretta 92FS or CZ 75B - posted in Handguns: So I decided I still want a full-sized, metal-framed 9mm. The p-01 is a great size, has a rail and shoots very nice. *The Beretta is easier to take down to clean is really the only advantage to me. Compare the dimensions and specs of CZ 75 Compact and Beretta 92 FS Compact Between the 92FS compact and CZ P01, I prefer the CZ. Do you consider it safe to carry a striker fired handgun NO MANUAL SAFETY with a live round in the chamber ? I'm pretty sure I held a Beretta 92 at a gun show a few years ago and it felt big in my hands, but I really want to hold them both and know once and for all.

2022 Mitsubishi Outlander Release Date, Rabies Nclex Questions, M47 Transmission For Sale, Brandon Married At First Sight, Housing Trailers For Rent Near Me, Brandon Married At First Sight, Ocean Eyes Lyrics Meaning Genius, Why Does Mineta Exist, Audi A4 S-line Front Grill,